Current:Home > StocksPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -FundConnect
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
View
Date:2025-04-18 22:01:25
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at cara.tabachnick@cbsinteractive.com
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- South Florida debacle pushes Alabama out of top 25 of this week's NCAA 1-133 Re-Rank
- Los Angeles police officer shot and killed in patrol car outside sheriff's station
- The strike by auto workers is entering its 4th day with no signs that a breakthrough is near
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- In corrupt Libya, longtime warnings of the collapse of the Derna dams went unheeded
- Wild black bear at Walt Disney World in Florida delays openings
- For Shakhtar Donetsk in the Champions League, representing Ukraine is a duty to the country
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Hunter Biden sues the IRS over tax disclosures after agent testimony
Ranking
- Small twin
- 11 Mexican police officers convicted in murders of 17 migrants who were shot and burned near U.S. border
- UAW strike, first cases from Jan. 6 reach SCOTUS, Biden on economy: 5 Things podcast
- A homeless man living on national forest land was shot by federal police. He's now suing
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Clinton Global Initiative will launch network to provide new humanitarian aid to Ukrainians
- Bear euthanized after intestines blocked by paper towels, food wrappers, other human waste
- A railroad worker was crushed to death in Ohio by a remote-controlled train. Unions have concerns
Recommendation
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
Horoscopes Today, September 16, 2023
Here's what not to do when you open a 401(k)
2 charged with murder following death of 1-year-old at day care
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Military searches near South Carolina lakes for fighter jet whose pilot safely ejected
Italy mulls new migrant crackdown as talk turns to naval blockade to prevent launching of boats
The Plain Bagel Rule: How naked bread is the ultimate test of a bakery